Archive for the 'Administrative' Category

Birthdays

by Jason Stotts

I just had my 3oth birthday yesterday.  I’ll be honest, it feels a little strange to be thirty.  Not that I feel like I’m old now, I don’t.  It’s more just that I expected that I’d have my life more together by the time I hit 30.  Well, that’s a little strong, my life is together except for one crucial thing: a career.  I figured I’d have one of those things by the time I was thirty.  This is not to say I don’t have a job, but rather that I feel like I could be doing something much more rewarding. Oh well, I guess I’ll figure it out sooner or later. (Incidentally, if you’re in charge of a philosophy department looking fro grad students or are offering a lucrative writing career…let me know.  I would also love to go and study at the Kinsey Institute for a while!)

I know that some people don’t like celebrating birthdays, but I’ve always liked celebrating my birthday and the birthdays of the people I care about.  I think it’s nice to take time out of our busy lives and focus on the value that those who are close to you bring to your life.  When it’s my own birthday I try to think about the things that I’ve done in the last year and the things I’ve accomplished.  For this birthday, I had a lot to think about with all the things that have happened since I was 20.

Two weeks ago before my birthday, I asked people to donate to Erosophia or at least write me to let me know that you value my work.  I didn’t get as many responses as I might have hoped, but I did get some really nice donations, a couple of notes, and even a couple of gifts. One of the gifts I got was from the “Objectively Charming” etsy store whose owner sent me some very nice things, including an Atlas keychain:

il_570xN.405063537_p19r

And an Ayn Rand tribute charm bracelet:

il_570xN.401889033_5dx1

They’ve also offered to donate to Erosophia for every purchase, so go and give them some business!

If you want to help support directly Erosophia, please consider donating or at least letting me know my work is making a difference to you.

Donate via PayPal: 

If you don’t have the money, please at least write to me or help support Erosophia in some way.

You can get me a present through my Amazon Birthday list or feel free to buy me an Amazon Gift Card!  I love Amazon and buy a ton of stuff from there.

If you want to write me, for this or any reason, do so at Jason(at)JasonStotts.com.

Minimally, like Erosophia on Facebook.

If my work has been a value to you at all, please take a minute and let me know.

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Going Flying

by Jason Stotts

My wife is super thoughtful.  She knows that I’ve been wanting to try flying a plane for a while now, so what’d she do?  She got me a “discovery flight” so I could go up in a plane and try it out.

DSCF1472

That’s me, in front of the little Cessna I’m about to fly.

It was a lot of fun to take the plane up in the air.  The instructor had me do most of the flying, including driving out onto the runway, taking off (he controlled the throttle), and flying around for half an hour.  The only thing I didn’t do was land the plane.  It was really interesting how different it is to fly a really light plane than to drive a car or a boat. Actually, it was a little like boating insofar as the waves can throw the boat around.  I had a great time and if I had a ton more money, maybe I’d consider going for my pilot’s license   As it is, though, I think I’ll stick to less expensive hobbies.  I’m really glad I got to go up and try it though!

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

Help Save California’s Nude Beaches

by Jason Stotts

Nude beaches in California have been under attack and many historically nude beaches have lost their designation.  The state of California is now wasting taxpayer money patrolling these beaches and citing people for nudity.  This is a travesty.  As I wrote in my essay on nude beaches, being nude in nature, especially on the beach, makes more sense than being clothed.  It is only our shame of our bodies that we get from our christian culture that prevents us from fully enjoying our humanity.  If you’re in California and want to make a difference, see the below and help in the fight to bring nude beaches back to California.

**********************************************************************

                     NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE

                           ACTION ALERT

**********************************************************************

                   http://www.naturistaction.org 

**********************************************************************

Copyright 2013 by the Naturist Action Committee, which is responsible for its content. Permission is granted for the posting, forwarding or redistribution of this message, provided that it is reproduced in its entirety and without alteration.

DATE: April 28, 2013

SUBJECT: California

TO: Naturists and other concerned citizens

 

Dear Naturist,

 

This is an Action Alert from the Naturist Action Committee. NAC is asking for your immediate involvement to support an effort to have the State of California create officially designated areas for clothing-optional recreation in state parks.

 

ACTION SUMMARY

1. Attend a meeting of the California Park and Recreation Commission on May 17.

 

2. Contact the Commission in writing.

 

CALIFORNIA STATE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION

The California State Park and Recreation Commission is NOT the same as the State Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). Under California law, the Commission has specific duties and authorizations, including:

  • the approval of general plans for units of the State Park System,
  • classifying units of the System,
  • establishing general policies for the DPR Director,
  • recommending to the Director a comprehensive recreation policy for the state.

In the wake of last year’s scandal involving the California Department of Parks and Recreation, NAC is looking for the appointed State Park bureaucracy to assert some leadership. The Commission has had the authority and the responsibility all along to establish general policy and to recommend policy to DPR, and that’s what NAC is seeking.

 

ACTION 1: ATTEND COMMISSION’S PUBLIC MEETING ON MAY 17 

If you’re near the Monterey Bay area of California (or you can arrange to be there), NAC requests that you attend a public meeting of the State Park and Recreation Commission that is scheduled to be held in Santa Cruz on Friday, May 17, 2013.

 

DATE: Friday, May 17, 2013

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

LOCATION:

Forest Conference Center

Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley

6001 La Madrona Drive

Santa Cruz, California 95060

 

The official public notice for the meeting may be viewed at:

http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=27397

 

The Commission’s agenda for the meeting is available at: http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=27398

 

The naturist issue is not on the agenda for the meeting. Regardless, we need to let the Commission know of our concerns and our expectations. Members of the public will have an opportunity to give brief statements during the public comment portion of the meeting. Whether you speak or not, your presence at the meeting is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT to lend support to the message of naturists. We seek the setting aside of areas for clothing-optional recreation in State Park units.

 

There are few items on the meeting agenda for May 17, and the meeting is likely to move quickly. Please plan to be at the Hilton Santa Cruz/Scotts Valley in Santa Cruz no later than a half hour before the start of the meeting. Those who wish to speak must sign up to do so before the meeting commences.

 

The Commission has met infrequently and irregularly for the past four years, but NAC has been at every single one of the Commission’s meetings during that period of time. With your help and participation, we’ll make a significant showing at this meeting, too.

 

If you’re planning to attend the meeting, please contact:

NAC board member Allen Baylis

rab@baylislaw.com

(714) 962-0915

 

or NAC executive director Bob Morton

execdir@naturistaction.org

(512) 282-6621

 

ACTION 2: WRITE TO THE COMMISSION

If you’re unable to attend the meeting, you can still help. NAC asks that you write to the Commission. Send your comments by e-mail, fax or surface mail. Those who will be at the meeting on May 17 are also encouraged to write.

 

WHO SHOULD WRITE?

NAC is requesting ALL NATURISTS and other concerned individuals to contact California officials on this important matter, regardless of your place of residence. California understands the importance of out-of-state visitors who come to enjoy the state’s beaches, lakes and streams. The opportunity to provide diverse recreational opportunities applies to those visitors, as well as to California residents. While all are encouraged to make their voices heard, the participation of Californians is, of course, particularly important.

 

Send a letter, a fax or an e-mail. Phone calls will likely be ineffective in this specific context.

 

     California State Park & Recreation Commission 

     PO Box 942896

     Sacramento, CA 94296

     FAX: (916) 654-6374

     Louis Nastro, Assistant to the Commission

     E-MAIL: LNastro@parks.ca.gov 

 

Send a copy to:

 

     California Department of Natural Resources  

     Natural Resources Agency 

     1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1311 

     Sacramento, CA 95814 

     FAX: (916) 653-8102

     E-MAIL: secretary@resources.ca.gov 

 

NAC encourages you to send copies of your faxes and paper mail to:

NAC, PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903.

Send copies of your e-mails to: CA@naturistaction.org

 

WHAT SHOULD YOU SAY?

 

When you write:

 

a) Be polite.

 

b) Be known. Give your name and address. If you are a California resident or a frequent visitor to California, be sure to point that out. Anonymous letters have very little impact.

 

c) Be focused. Keep your correspondence brief and on target.

 

d) Be positive. Remember that we’re trying to ENCOURAGE the Parks Department to do something. Please do not take a scolding tone.

 

e) Be clear. Say that you SUPPORT the designation of clothing-optional areas in units of the State Park System.

 

f) Be sure to make a request that your correspondence (letter, fax, e-mail) be included in the permanent public record of the California Park and Recreation Commission meeting of May 17, 2013.

 

Additional talking / writing points:

 

1) On March 25, 2013, a state oversight agency, the Little Hoover Commission, issued a comprehensive review of the California State Park system. Among other conclusions, the report says that DPR lacks the flexibility to be responsive to the diversity of its users and supporters. We must encourage the Commission to respond positively to the deficiencies identified by the report.

 

2) Our focus is not exclusively on San Onofre State Beach or any other individual park. Although San Onofre was the first State Park unit at which DPR killed its policy for managing clothing-optional recreation, it has not been the last. Ticketing for mere nudity in State Park units has spread throughout the entire state of California. A unified policy that manages FOR a significant group of park users is exactly what the Commission is responsible for creating, but it has not done so for clothing-optional users. The present lack of a comprehensive statewide policy threatens ALL clothing-optional areas in California State Park units.

 

3) Clothing-optional recreation is a diverse use that’s well supported by the public, yet Parks Department policy against clothing-optional recreation is completely out of sync with public sentiment and the expressed preferences of California residents. A public opinion survey on this topic was commissioned in 2009 by the Naturist Education Foundation and was conducted by the prestigious polling firm of Zogby International. In that statewide poll:

 

79 percent of Californians believe people should be allowed to enjoy nude sunbathing on a beach or other location that is designated for that purpose.

 

60 percent of Californians say that they are not offended by the nonsexual nudity of others.

 

62 percent of Californians agree that the California Department of Parks and Recreation should exercise the legal authority it presently has to designate clothing-optional areas in state parks.

 

View details of the 2009 NEF California Poll:

www.naturisteducation.org/nef.ca.poll.2009/

 

4) For thirty years, the Department’s Cahill Policy allowed a means to manage for clothing-optional recreation in units of the State Park system. The nullification of the Cahill Policy has left the department with no statewide policy to address a form of recreation that’s obviously popular with the public. It’s the duty of the Commission to address matters of policy.

 

5) Some Park and Rec Commission members have suggested that a positive response for those who seek clothing-optional recreation in state parks somehow requires a new legislative solution. That view is incorrect. Title 14, Section 4322 of California Code of Regulations already gives DPR the power and authority to set aside areas for clothing-optional use. What the Department needs NOW is policy guidance from the Commission to do what the Department is already allowed to do TODAY.

 

MORE INFORMATION AND RESOURCES

Additional information and links are available, along with this NAC Action Alert on the web site of the Naturist Action Committee.

 

www.naturistaction.org

 

Select “Alerts” and find this NAC Action Alert under Current Alerts, or use this convenient shortcut: www.naturistaction.org/caparks Among the material on the NAC site, you’ll find the complete text of the Little Hoover Report.

 

PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE HELPING NATURISTS!

The Naturist Action Committee is the volunteer nonprofit political adjunct to The Naturist Society. NAC exists to advance and protect the rights and interests of naturists throughout North America. Fighting for the clothing-optional recreational use of public land is expensive. To do its job, NAC relies entirely on the voluntary generosity of supporters like you.

 

After you’ve made your plans to attend the Commission meeting on May 17 and/or contacted the officials at the Commission and the Natural Resources Agency, please take a moment to send a donation to:

 

   NAC

   PO Box 132

   Oshkosh, WI 54903

 

Or call toll free (800) 886-7230 to donate by phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or use your credit card to make a convenient online donation: www.naturistaction.org/donate/ 

 

Thank you for choosing to make a difference!

 

Naturally,

 

Bob Morton

Executive Director

Naturist Action Committee

 

—————————————————————

Naturist Action Committee (NAC) – PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903

Executive Dir. Bob Morton       – execdir@naturistaction.org

Board Member Allen Baylis      – rab@baylislaw.com

Board Member Charles Harris    – carlopianoforte@gmail.com

Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick  – naturist@sunclad.com

—————————————————————

 

 

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

CatalystCon West

by Jason Stotts

The deadline for CatalystCon West speaker submissions is coming up soon and I’m planning on attending after hearing so many good things about the prior Catalystcons.  However, I need some feedback on my proposal.  I feel like it’s just a little off and needs some fine-tuning.  Take a look at it and if you have any suggestions, let me know! 

Requirements http://catalystcon.com/call-for-speakers/

Speakers should prepare for sessions that run an hour and ten minutes, including at least 20 minutes of open discussion.  Panel submissions should consist of no more than four speakers (including a moderator, if applicable) and all speakers for panel sessions must be confirmed prior to submission.

Speaker submissions should be sent in plain text in the body of your email. Email all submissions to: CatalystConSubmissions@gmail.com.

Session description: (250 word max)

Speaker Information

Name: Jason Stotts

Email: Jason(at)JasonStotts.com

URL: www.JasonStotts.com

Facebook: www.Facebook.com/ErosophiaBlog

Twitter: @jstotts

Bio: (200 word max)

Photo (300-500px wide)

Prior Conferences:

-       Conference of the Atlanta Objectivist Society (ATLOSCon): 2012, 2011

-       Chicago Objectivist Society Conference (COSCon): 2011

-       University of Northern Florida Philosophy Conference: 2006

AV requirements: None.

Session Information

Title of Session: Reclaiming the Sexual Moral Narrative

The war against sex rages on with fundamentalist christians on the offensive and us on the defensive, against the ropes.  But, it doesn’t have to be this way.  The weapon they are using against us, against which we have no defense is morality: they have claimed the moral high-ground and we are defenseless without it.  Consequently, in the field of sexual ethics, we see nothing but a bleak landscape: prohibitions against this and condemnations about that.  But, isn’t there more?  Couldn’t sexual ethics actually tell us how to incorporate sex into our lives in a healthy way that serves to improve our lives?  It can and it should.  Moreover, it was our ceding of the moral high ground to the anti-sex side that weakened our position and forced us to always argue on the defensive.  By reclaiming the moral narrative, we can not only have better sex lives, but we can help to reclaim sexual ethics from those who hate the body and our enjoyment of it.  We can, in one fell swoop, improve our lives and put the arguments about sex back on fundamental principles.

In this talk I’m going to lay out what a philanthropic (pro-human) sexual ethic looks like and show how this foundation can restructure the field.  I will also show how restructuring the arguments in different fields of sexual ethics can take us from being on the defensive to making real headway in the culture.  We may not be able to “win” against pundits who would never change their minds anyway, but if we can change the culture, it doesn’t matter. We will have won what we really wanted: a world where sex is a real value in human life.

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Birthdays and Gratitude

by Jason Stotts

My very first blog post was nearly 8 years ago on May 8th, 2005, meaning that Erosophia is about to turn eight. My own birthday is in exactly two weeks and I’ll be turning 30.  As far as birthdays go, 30 is an interesting one: you’re definitely an adult and have been for a while.  You can’t imagine yourself as still a “20-something” anymore, college ended more than 5 years ago, and so on.  It’s real, my life is here and I’m living it.  Not that I didn’t think I was before, but much of your life when you’re younger is about getting ready to “live your life” in some amorphous future.  Well, when you turn 30, your future is here and you can’t pretend it isn’t anymore.

Blogging is interesting.  I never set out to be a blogger.  In fact, I only started writing a blog on a lark.  Then, I just sort of kept writing and at some point things got interesting.  Somewhere along the line people started reading and now some 15,000 unique people visit Erosophia every month, in addition to the hundreds who subscribe via RSS.  As Erosophia has gotten more popular, I find that I need to keep increasing hosting and bandwidth to keep up with traffic.  It’s obviously a good problem to have, but it also requires money to solve.

Not only that, but in order to keep writing, a person needs spiritual fuel: he needs to know his work is good and that it is having a positive impact in people’s lives.There’s no reason for me to write and share it with the world if it’s not helping people, so if you want me to keep writing, let me know it’s making a difference.

The point of this post, then is to ask you to help support Erosophia.  It is also, though, to ask you to help support me.  I’m asking you, in essence, to trade values with me.  Erosophia and my writing is a value to you if you’re reading this (if it’s not, what are you doing here?).  So, I’m asking that you take a minute and help support my work and me.  Ideally, you should donate $829, one for each of Erosophia’s posts.  If that’s a little much for you, then donate $30 for my thirtieth birthday.  If not that, then at least $8 for Erosophia’s birthday.  If you can’t donate monetarily, I ask that you at least take the time to leave a comment here or write me if my work has helped you in your life.    You can also, if you want something a little different, buy me a birthday present from my list on Amazon.

If you don’t have the money, please at least write to me or help support Erosophia in some way.

Donate via PayPal: 

You can get me a present through my Amazon Birthday list or feel free to buy me an Amazon Gift Card!  I love Amazon and buy a ton of stuff from there.

If you want to write me, for this or any reason, do so at Jason(at)JasonStotts.com.

Minimally, like Erosophia on Facebook.

If my work has been a value to you at all, please take a minute and let me know.

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

Event: Darrel Ray “I Am Not A Christian So Why Do I Act Like One?”

by Jason Stotts

I’ll be attending this event on Thursday and you should come check it out if you’re in the Temecula area.

I Am Not A Christian So Why Do I Act Like One?

by Darrel Ray author of Sex & God

Thursday, May 2, 2013 7:00 PM

Why do non-believers continue to behave like Christians when it comes to their sexual beliefs?

Darrel Ray, author of Sex & God: How Religion Distorts Sexuality, will tell us how and why non-believers continue to think and behave like Christians when it comes to sexuality.

I saw Darrel speak a couple of years ago when his book The God Virus had just come out.  It’s a pretty good book and definitely a good metaphor, even if I think the metaphor is a little stretched in places.  Either way, Darrel is a good speaker and it should be a really interesting talk!

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

Announcement: I won’t be Speaking at ATLOSCon

by Jason Stotts

I made the decisions today that I will not be speaking at ATLOSCon this year. Let me say only that it is not an issue of personal animosity between myself and the organizers, nor is it that I have some sort of issue with the conference itself.  ATLOSCon is a great conference and I do recommend that people check it out.

(Edited from original.)

Automatically Generated Related Posts:

About Erosophia

by Jason Stotts

tl:dr version: Erosophia is dedicated to understanding sex from a philosophical perspective. I want to create a new field of philosophy called “sexual ethics.” I think sexual ethics must rely on a eudaimonistic framework whose goal is the long-term living well of the individual.

I don’t talk much about my meta-goals here on Erosophia and what I’m trying to accomplish, so I’m going to take a minute today and rectify that.

My goal with Erosophia and the book I’m working on, Eros and Ethos, is to create the field of sexual ethics.  You might think the term “create” is rather strong, given that such a field already exists.  Yet, you might be wrong about that.  The field that exists now and is called “sexual ethics” should really be called “sexual ethics according to the catholic church,” since only catholics write in that field and it’s all about how abortion is immoral, masturbation is a sin, and birth control is an abomination, because their imaginary friend in the sky says it is.

(Actually, they do talk about a couple of other things.  I one time went to a catholic “philosophy” conference and listened to catholic “philosophers” debate the catholic issue of “ensoulment”, where they believe their god goes into a woman’s uterus and puts a soul in (ensouls) an egg the moment it is fertilized.  Problematically, though, sometimes eggs split (twin).  So what happens to the soul?  Does it split in two pieces?  Did god give two souls to the original egg? (A “person” with two souls!)  Did their god lack the divine foreknowledge to anticipate this event? (A soulless “person”!) Even if you can answer that question (a catholic can’t), what happens if the egg twins and then recombines?! The mental gymnastics some people are willing to go through to reconcile their crazy beliefs with the way the world actually is can be astounding. Anyway, I’ve digressed.)

The point is that I want to create sexual ethics as a legitimate field of philosophy.  You might think “but Jason, that’s not how it works, there aren’t just sub-fields of philosophy!”  If you thought that, though, you’d definitely be wrong.  There are so many sub-fields of philosophy that enumerating them would be tedious, but let me give you a couple:

Primary sub-fields:

Metaphysics

Epistemology

Ethics

Politics

Aesthetics

Secondary sub-fields:

Philosophy of Mind

Philosophy of Language

Ancient Philosophy

Modern Philosophy

Jurisprudence

The list goes on and on.  In each case a sub-field is necessary when there is an intractable problem or where specialized knowledge is necessary in order to understand the field properly.  Sometimes even sub-fields (like Ethics) have lots of sub-fields (like bio-medical ethics, business ethics, sexual ethics?, etc).  I think that sex is much the same as bio-medical ethics or business ethics: you need to know lots of things specific to sex in order to properly understand sexual ethics.

What makes sexual ethics worthy of a sub-field?  First, sexuality is a very important part of what it means to be a person.  I firmly believe that without a proper understanding of one’s own sexuality, one cannot understand oneself as a person.   Second, sexuality is very important for living well and achieving happiness. Since sexuality is an important part of what it means to be a person, ethics cannot be silent about it if Ethics is to be about humans as they really are. Additionally, one cannot hope to achieve happiness if one’s love and sex life is out of sorts.  Third, specialized knowledge of human physiology, psychology, and philosophy are necessary in order to properly do sexual ethics.  Attempting to do sexual ethics without this kind of knowledge leads to absurd conclusions (like those who argue that the penis only has one proper function).  I could continue, but I think the point is established.

Of course, even once I’ve established the field, there is much to be done.  Thinking that a thing is important and people should have things to say about it isn’t the same as actually doing the intellectual work and saying these things.  That’s what I’m trying to do with my book that I’m writing Eros and Ethos and here on ErosophiaErosophia serves as a testing ground for ideas for me where I can put pen to paper and make sure arguments hang together and make sense before I can consider them putting them in Eros and Ethos.  That makes you, dear readers, my philosophical guinea pigs.

Regardless, and I hope you’re not too bothered, in order to actually attempt to flesh out the field, one needs to give an account of the framework from which one is going to attempt to answer these questions.  In my own case, I think the only proper moral framework is a eudaimonistic one.  Now, this is obviously a controversial claim, but I think that any other system has to either try to explain away the individual agent or convince them that some form of unreality is better, making these systems irrational.

So, you might be wondering, what is eudaimonism?  Eudaimonism is a Greek word meaning something like happiness (in a rich sense) in English, but since the word happiness has come to mean no more than feelings of joy or pleasure, let’s say it means something more like living well, or flourishing.  I’m still going to use the word happiness, but just know that I mean something more robust than is usually meant.  The point of eudaimonism is to help an individual person achieve living well in their own lives. In order to not beg the question of why someone would want to live well (i.e. you should live well because you should live well?), eudaimonism as I understand it must be a system of hypothetical ethics.  This is as opposed to categorical ethics where a person is simply beholden to do whatever the moral system says because the moral system says that to do otherwise is evil (there is an inherent contradiction in all systems of categorical ethics).  Hypothetical ethics are ethics given in the form of conditionals, so maybe it should be called conditional ethics, in the form of if-then: “if you want to live well, then you should…”.  This is a wildly important distinction.  The only “because” of hypothetical ethics is because the agent wants to live well.  It requires no lying to the agent about father-figures in the sky or made up places to go after you die, it requires no threats of punishment or torture.  People choose to be eudaimonists freely and follow its edicts because they want to live well.  If they don’t want to live well, then they’re free to not take the actions to do so and die. For biological beings stagnation is death.  We are either moving towards life or to death at all times and it’s not simply enough to want to maintain your heartbeat.

This sort of ethical perspective is important if we want to understand the value of sex in a person’s total life or even understand the morality of particular sexual choices or sexual acts, which I think cannot be understood apart from the total context of a person’s life.  If we want to understand the value of sex, we must do so in situ.  But even once we’ve established this framework and committed ourselves to the quest, we’re not exactly in the clear yet.  We need to learn as much as we can about sex, about what it is, how it works, its cultural implications, etc., we need to learn as much about it as we can about every facet of sex from both the physiological perspective, the psychological perspective, and the philosophical perspective.  For example, if we don’t understand that the function of the coronal ridge of the glans penis (the ridge around the head of the human penis), then we might be tempted to think humans had a monogamous history; but this evolutionary feature stands in stark contrast to that idea;  our common cultural assumptions and the reality of our biology aren’t always in agreement.  As philosophers, we need to understand our own assumptions and theoretical backgrounds if we hope to arrive at truth.

And this is precisely why sexual ethics needs to be its own sub-field in philosophy: in order to actually do it well, you need knowledge specific to sexuality.  It is not enough to know about ethics in general, one must also understand sexuality.

So, I welcome you, fellow Erosophers and Sapiosexuals, to join me in creating this field and giving it life.  It won’t always be easy, and it’s sure to challenge some of our own beliefs along the way, but in the end we shall end up with the truth and a path to make our lives the best they can be.  And really, is there any higher goal than that?  I think not.

Automatically Generated Related Posts:



Google+